|
| |
1 - 25 of 400 | Next Page
|
Too many results? Filter by:
Sort results by: Relevance | Date | Company | Price
|
Insurance Video: 50% Speed to Market Gains with BRMS by IBM
March 2009 - (Free Research)
Check out this webcast to hear discussions from Kyle Kelt, Director of IT for VSP; Donald Light, Senior Analyst/Insurance Group for Celent, and domain experts from IBM and ILOG, an IBM Company.
|
FACTS® WDS by Ebix Health, Inc.
January 2001 - (Free Research)
FACTS® WDS (Work Distribution System) module is an electronic claim workflow management system for your adjusters.
|
FACTS® CLAIMS & ENCOUNTERS by Ebix Health, Inc.
January 2001 - (Free Research)
FACTS® CLAIMS & ENCOUNTERS is a fully automated, real-time processing system for complete, online adjudication of medical, dental, vision, prescription drug, disability and COBRA claims and encounters.
|
FACTS® 125 by Ebix Health, Inc.
January 2001 - (Free Research)
FACTS® 125 is a fully automated and comprehensive system for the management of Section 125, Flexible Benefit plans.
|
FACTS® PPO by Ebix Health, Inc.
January 2001 - (Free Research)
FACTS® PPO is a fully automated provider network processing module, this system provides you with a fully integrated database for providers (both practitioners and facilities).
|
A Guide to the Value of Reliable Data in Insurance by DataFlux Corporation
November 2009 - (Free Research)
Only when data is trusted can it be used in confidence in all insurance operational and analytical process activities. This paper examines the impact of unreliable data on insurance companies. It then defines the requirements needed to guarantee data reliability in insurance and offers a practical approach to creating and governing that data.
|
FACTS® Web by Ebix Health, Inc.
January 2001 - (Free Research)
FACTS®Web facilitates the sharing of real-time information directly from your FACTS® system to insureds, employees, and provider's web browsers through the Internet.
|
Getting Control of Electronic Discovery by FTI Technology
December 2008 - (Free Research)
This ESG analyst paper discusses the challenges posed by electronic discovery processes, current methods of dealing with these issues, and the potential cost savings that companies could achieve if they choose to invest in technology to help expedite the entire operation.
|
Demystifying Data De-Duplication: Choosing the Best Solution by FalconStor Software
February 2009 - (Free Research)
Data de-duplication has been described as the next evolutionary step in backup technology. Many vendors lay claim to the best data de-duplication approach, leaving customers to face the difficulty of separating hype from reality. This document provides the background information required to make an informed data de-duplication purchasing decision.
|
How SAP Customers Quit Paper: Keeping Inbound Documents Electronic by Esker Inc.
July 2009 - (Free Research)
View this webcast to learn about the advantages of an electronic lifecycle for inbound documents, as well as the benefits of quitting paper and going green. Along with efficiencies and cost-savings results achieved by Esker customers who have quit paper, the web seminar will demonstrate automation of two inbound document processes as examples.
|
How In-House Electronic Discovery Delivers Savings by FTI Technology
December 2008 - (Free Research)
Companies, such as the one highlighted in this paper, should begin to consider electronic discovery as a core business process and seek ways to optimize it.
|
Securing Data Stored On Tape With Encryption by Quantum Corporation
July 2009 - (Free Research)
With companies storing data for longer periods of time to meet compliance regulations and business best practices, the inherent risk of a data breach is growing significantly. Organizations should develop sound encryption key management processes to minimize administrative overhead and maximize the value of data encryption.
|
Calculator: Compare the Storage Systems of Different Vendors by Xiotech Corporation
November 2009 - (Free Research)
The Xiotech Value Index was designed to establish an industry benchmark for evaluating disparate data storage systems. This formula determines each system’s “Value Index” by taking a holistic view of the system, analyzing its functionality versus its cost. Higher Value Indexs are more desirable.
|
|
|