|
| |
1 - 25 of 481 | Next Page
|
Featured Sponsors
Trend Micro Endpoint Comparative Report Performed by AV-Test.org by Trend Micro, Inc.
January 31, 2011 - (Free Research)
In May of 2010, AV-Test.org performed endpoint security benchmark testing on five market-leading Enterprise endpoint solutions from Symantec, McAfee, Microsoft, Sophos and Trend Micro. Read this comparative report to see the results of these tests and how Trend Micro Worry-Free Business Security stands distinctly apart from other products.
|
Excerpts from Virus Bulletin Comparative Reviews August-December 2010 by ESET
March 16, 2011 - (Free Research)
The basic requirements for a product to achieve VB100 certification status are that a product detects, both on demand and on access, in its default settings, all malware known to be ‘In the Wild’ at the time of the review, and generates no false positives when scanning a set of clean files.
|
Virus Bulletin: Comparative Reviews in 2010 by ESET
June 16, 2010 - (Free Research)
This paper shows you the latest news about the VB100 testing, Linux Enterprise Server 11, Windows XP SP3, Windows Server 2008 R2 and so much more.
|
The EVA takes on NetApp and EMC by Hewlett-Packard Company
March 16, 2009 - (Free Research)
In their second comparative challenge, The HP StorageWorks EVA asked three teams of high school students who had never configured a storage array to run timed tests on EVA, NetApp and EMC to see which one is easiest to use. EVA was the clear winner
|
Independent Lab Comparative Review by Avaya
June 15, 2011 - (Free Research)
MierConsulting engineers conducted an hands-on, comparative review of three leading contact center packages, focusing on these products' multimedia, mixed voice and text-based contacts - capabilities.
|
LTO 6 vs LTO 5 Comparative Performance White Paper by IBM
September 28, 2012 - (Free Research)
This white paper describes the performance of the IBM System Storage LTO Ultrium 6 tape drive (LTO-6 tape drive) working on open systems environments. Read now to learn more.
|
Should Your Email Live In The Cloud? A Comparative Cost Analysis by Google Apps
January 19, 2011 - (Free Research)
This report presents a spreadsheet cost model to help you calculate your fully loaded on-premise email costs and compare it against cloud-based alternatives. Bottom line: Cloud-based email makes sense for companies or divisions as large as 15,000 users.
|
Should Your Email Live In The Cloud? A Comparative Cost Analysis by Google
January 05, 2009 - (Free Research)
This report presents a spreadsheet cost model to help you calculate your fully loaded on-premise email costs and compare it against cloud-based alternatives. Bottom line: Cloud-based email makes sense for companies or divisions as large as 15,000 users.
|
Application Note: Structured Testing - The Path to Thorough Code Coverage by McCabe Software, Inc.
March 15, 2011 - (Free Research)
Basis path testing, also known as Structured Testing, is the primary code-based testing strategy recommended by McCabe Software and supported by McCabe IQ. The main idea behind this testing is that decision outcomes within a software function should be tested independently. This article provides an overview of the benefits of basis path testing.
|
CRM Total Cost of Ownership: Fees, Subscriptions and Hidden Costs by SugarCRM Inc.
July 15, 2011 - (Free Research)
The following analysis provides a comparative price analysis of four leading CRM solutions for midmarketorganizations. Forrester Research defines midmarket organizations as any organization with revenues of lessthan $1 billion and/or fewer than 1,000 employees.
|
Fast and Effective Endpoint Security for Business by ESET
June 20, 2011 - (Free Research)
This report presents a comparative analysis on the performance, effectiveness and usability of seven security solutions from some of the world’s largest security vendors.
|
Rational Quality Manager by IBM
November 04, 2009 - (Free Research)
Download your free trial of IBM Rational Quality Manager V2, a collaborative, Web-based, quality management solution that offers comprehensive test planning and test asset management from requirements to defects.
|
|
|